Introduction

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, commonly known as the LDS Church, is a diverse and evolving community. Within this community, a new movement that aligns with progressive values has gained attention, particularly in the form of what is known as the ProgMo (Progressive Mormon) movement. This article explores the nature of this movement, its relationship with traditional Church values, and the perspectives it engenders among members of the LDS Church.

The ProgMo Movement: A New Direction within the LDS Community

The ProgMo movement represents a significant shift within the LDS Church, characterized by values that resonate with humanism and progressive ideals. Unlike the strict adherence to traditional doctrines, this movement embraces a modern, inclusive, and socially conscious interpretation of faith. Members of the ProgMo movement are often animal lovers who value the healing power of companion pets and advocate for animal rights, much to their appreciation.

Challenges and Controversies Surrounding Progressive Mormonism

The ProgMo movement faces several challenges due to the fundamentally conservative nature of the LDS Church. Authority structures within the Church can be rigid, and the establishment of new ideas is often met with resistance and potential excommunication. This regnant authority can shut down open discussions and debates, leading to a more uniform and traditional approach to faith.

Historical Context and Need for Explanation

The LDS Church has often maintained an emotion-based faith, which can sometimes lead to an emotional handling of historical events. While this emotional engagement can be powerful, it may also obscure the complex historical truths and challenges that the Church has faced. For those advocating for progressive values, explaining the messy history and addressing past controversies is crucial to fostering a more inclusive and open faith community.

Extremes within the LDS Community: DezNats and ProgMos

Thealogical landscape of the LDS community on social media platforms such as Twitter is increasingly divided into distinct factions. Two notable extremes are the DezNats (Dezire Nates) and the ProgMos. DezNats are often perceived as the LDS equivalent of Pharisees, adhering rigidly to the gospel and often promoting conservative political views. In contrast, ProgMos represent the LDS equivalent of Sadducees, embracing progressive ideals and often aligning with liberal political leanings.

The Pharisees and Sadducees Analogy

The parallel between DezNats and Pharisees and ProgMos and Sadducees is closer than one might initially think. Pharisees were known for adding numerous cultural and legal codifications to maintain a strict adherence to the faith, while Sadducees focused on maintaining a rigid set of rules but denied the existence of an afterlife. Similarly, DezNats often parrot extreme versions of Republican talking points, while ProgMos embrace extreme versions of Democratic talking points. Both groups are seen as extremes within the LDS community, often employing emotional and sometimes violent rhetoric to promote their views.

Problems and Pitfalls of the ProgMo Movement

Members of the ProgMo movement spend a significant portion of their time during General Conference criticizing the messages of Church leaders. They tend to interpret talks and actions through a highly political lens, often seen as proxy battles for the soul of the Church. The movement has been plagued by controversial claims, protests, and public demonstrations, raising questions about its sincerity and the impact of its radical views on the broader faith community.

Examples and Controversies

For instance, discussions about new apostles, temples, and the messages of leaders are often met with intense scrutiny and criticism from ProgMos. They have gone so far as to protest against new leadership appointments, questioning the choices made by the Church and demanding changes to doctrine. These actions not only divide the community but also raise questions about the sustainability of such a movement within the structure of the LDS Church.

Conclusion: Empathy and Understanding

While the ProgMo movement represents a valid and important voice within the LDS community, it is essential to approach these perspectives with empathy and understanding. The challenges and controversies surrounding the movement highlight the complexities of balancing tradition and change within a faith community. As such, it is crucial for both members of the ProgMo movement and traditionalists to engage in open and respectful dialogue to foster a more inclusive and harmonious Mormon experience.