Why Does the Government Suppress Free Energy Technology?

The concept of free energy often evokes curiosity and skepticism. You may wonder whether free energy means energy that can be used without charge, or energy that you can produce yourself through your own labor and effort without compensation.

Rest assured, the US government does not forbid you from using free energy as long as you are not using someone else's produced energy for your consumption. Similarly, there is no such thing as 'free' on planet Earth, be it energy, education, healthcare, housing, or anything else. Simply put, everything has a cost, paid for by someone.

Understanding the Suppression of Free Energy Technology

The real question is, what is truly suppressing the growth of free energy technology?

A2A: The very nature of the universe.

There is no such thing as 'free energy' in the traditional sense. Even the cheapest sources of energy, such as solar and wind, require financial investment for their creation and a grid to transport the power. However, once a solar panel or wind turbine is installed, it can produce energy for 25 years at almost no cost and without pollution.

The suppression, therefore, is not from the government but from the fossil fuel industry. They spread anti-renewable propaganda to maintain their profits. The pollution from building solar and wind facilities is paid back within two years, compared to the continuous pollution caused by the use of oil, coal, or gas.

The Conspiracy Theory and Its Challenges

Free energy suppression or new energy suppression is a conspiracy theory suggesting that technologically viable, pollution-free, and no-cost energy sources are being suppressed by governments, corporations, or advocacy groups.

The devices alleged to be suppressed include perpetual motion machines, cold fusion generators, torus-based generators, and other unproven low-cost energy sources that claim to generate energy without cost or pollution. However, if such technologies were feasible, the US government, which is largely owned by the fossil fuel, banking, and defense industries, would suppress them. But they do not, as this suggests that these technologies are not feasible.

These technologies, if truly viable, would disrupt the existing economic and political structures. The fossil fuel industry, in particular, would lose significant market share and profits. Therefore, any claims of suppression need to be critically examined and evidence-based.

Conclusion

The debate around free energy technology is complex and multifaceted. While governments do not actively suppress the use of renewable energy, the fossil fuel industry's resistance is a significant obstacle. Understanding the economic and political factors behind the resistance is crucial for advancing and adopting more sustainable energy solutions.

For more information on the topics of free energy, government suppression, and renewable energy, visit reputable sources such as DOE Energy.gov and Renewable Energy World.