Why Meghan Markle Evokes Hatred and Controversy

Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, has become a polarizing figure in the British royal family. Her relationship with the monarchy and public often reignites discussions about class, race, and celebrity. Critics argue that her actions and public image have contributed significantly to the negative perceptions many hold towards her. This article delves into the reasons behind the hate and public criticism directed at Meghan Markle.

Narcissism and Hypocrisy

One of the central criticisms of Meghan Markle centers around her alleged narcissistic behavior. Critics argue that her actions are deeply selfish and manipulative. For instance, she often emphasizes her black heritage while simultaneously showing little interest in or interaction with the black community. Many point out that she has never dated a black man or had black female friends, which they see as a detachment from her claimed identity.

Moreover, her alleged dishonesty and reluctance to compromise on her personal image and branding have led to public disdain. When people didn't know her well, she was seen as acceptable, but as she rose to prominence, her actions and decisions became increasingly scrutinized.

Role and Responsibility

Another aspect of Meghan Markle's public persona is the perceived overreach in her roles as a member of the royal family. She has been criticized for guiding the Duke of Sussex, Prince Harry, in public appearances and media engagements, which some argue is unnecessary given Harry's established public persona.

Additionally, her interactions with the public and media have led to further criticism. Critics claim that her actions and words are detrimental to the public image of the monarchy and even to the taxpayer, given her spending habits and perceived entitlement. They argue that her actions often lead to negative public opinion and a sense of waste.

Entitlement and Unfounded Criticism

Meghan Markle's public image has also been criticized for her perceived sense of entitlement. Many argue that she is an entitled psychopath who wastes public money and damages the reputation of the royal family. Critics point out that she has a habit of complaining about not receiving enough money from taxpayers while her spending habits are seen as excessive. This has led to a perception that she is not a responsible member of the royal family.

Furthermore, her public behavior and statements have been seen as nonsensical and self-centered. For instance, her emphasis on social justice, coupled with her own actions, has come under heavy scrutiny. Critics argue that she lacks genuine commitment to social issues and uses these causes merely as a platform for self-promotion.

Comparison to Other Public Figures

Meghan Markle is compared unfavourably to other public figures, most notably Donald Trump's former wives. Critics argue that she is shallow and in it for fame and money, often boasting about her marriage rather than her own accomplishments. Unlike the other women, who had some claim to fame before their marriages, Meghan’s marriage to Harry was her first major venture into the public eye.

Her approach to charity and public engagement is also widely criticized. Some argue that her participation in charitable events and initiatives is superficial and more focused on personal branding than actual support or change.

Public Sentiment and Future

The future of Meghan Markle and her role in the royal family is a matter of ongoing debate. Her current status as a controversial figure has left many people eager for her departure or a redefinition of her role. Critics hope that she will redefine her public image and actions to align more closely with the values of the royal family and the public good.

In conclusion, while Meghan Markle may have achieved a significant position in the royal family, her public actions and image have contributed to widespread criticism and hatred from certain segments of society. As the discussion around public figures and their roles in society continues, her story is likely to remain a significant point of contention.