Believable Yet Unbelieved Truths: Design and Analogy in Human Existence

Before delving into the question of what is a believable thing that is not believed and what is a thing not believed that is believed, it is crucial to first understand the distinction between what can be believed and what cannot. This clarity is essential for navigating the complex landscape of human beliefs and their bases in evidence.

Understanding What Can and Cannot Be Believed

Some beliefs are either lacking in evidence or involve high risks. For example, if a friend says that dinner is not nice, one might want to verify the claim by trying it on their own. Similarly, if the same friend warns about drinking a certain drink because it might contain poison, the risk is too high to take without evidence.

Why Believe in Principles and Concepts Without Empirical Evidence

While certain beliefs such as Karma—the idea that one’s actions will have consequences—can be deeply personal and guiding, their validity is often based on cultural and spiritual narratives rather than empirical verification. However, believing in Karma encourages positive behaviors, as these actions tend to manifest positive outcomes even if they cannot be scientifically proven. Elders saying that good actions will bring good back is a way of reinforcing the value of ethical behavior, even if the exact mechanism of this belief remains unclear.

Unverified Claims about Deity

Beliefs about deities, such as the existence of GOD, are often not subject to empirical verification but are accepted through faith and divine revelation. Attempting to scientifically verify the existence of a divine being, as proposed in the anecdote, could be risky and possibly futile, as such concepts often transcend human understanding.

The Case for Design in Human Existence

The question of whether humans are the result of design goes beyond the realm of empirical science. Every tool and piece of machinery designed by humans has a designer. This leads us to the intriguing question: If everything designed by humans requires a designer, why couldn’t we, as humans, also be the result of a greater designer?

The analogy of movies can be quite apt here. All movies, regardless of their success, have a director. However, mega hits might seem to lack the need for a director in the public's perception. This perhaps suggests a misunderstanding of the complexity of the design process and the role of a director. Similarly, the idea of a creator or a designer for the universe may not be immediately intuitive, but it aligns with the observed complexity and intricate design evident in the world around us.

Notable Views on Design and Planning in the Universe

Notable figures like Albert Einstein have contributed to the discourse on design in the universe. His famous statement, “God does not play dice,” implies that the universe operates with purpose and design, rather than through chance. This aligns with the idea that everything seems to have a direction and a plan, just like every tool or machine designed by humans.

Implications for Critical Thinking

Critical thinking is essential in evaluating beliefs and claims. While some things are worth believing in based on cultural or spiritual beliefs, others require empirical evidence to support them. The question of whether humans are the result of a designer is one that warrants both belief and empirical inquiry, as it touches on fundamental questions about the nature of existence.

By understanding the distinction between compelling beliefs and beliefs that require evidence, individuals can engage in more productive and meaningful conversations about the nature of existence, design, and the role of a greater designer in the universe.